The real solution, which is so frightfully obviously that it can't even be discussed, is to force Facebook and Twitter to use open protocols (like email, or in this case gnu social) so no one controls the entire network, and individual sites can ban who they want.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Platform speech isnt a right.
-
Framing things in the nebulous terms of "rights" is silly.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There's an issue, but the rules are that while you are entitled to say what you like, no one must provide you with a soapbox. Should the penalty for building the best soapbox be to to have it taken away? Anent Alex Jones, et al: In an open square public defecators are taken away
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
You know Zuck owns about 30% of FB, right?
End of conversation
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
1st Amendment ratified in 1788. Criticism of the Federal Government criminalized by the Alien and Sedition Acts in 1798....The act also targeted freshly minted illegal aliens in their sanctuary cities for deportation. Human nature doesn't change.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think the better solution is using infrastructure that can't be censored.
@memobchhttp://memo.cashThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Freedom of speech is important. Even for those who do not share our vision. Simply because it is a slippery slope. Freedom of speech has to be for everybody. If you act as a filter for speech that gives you enourmous power over a society.pic.twitter.com/PUGawhy6gK
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.