No. Critical thinking is very important, esp. in an era of "fake news" and false accusations of it. We will never all agree, but we can at least find better ways to express our views. The hope, vain though it may be, is that we can all agree, at least, on *how* to disagree well.
-
-
-
it's called dialectical reasoning and it doesn't require you to have a fallacy checkpoint at every other sentence my bud
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
My critical thinking prof ~20yrs ago took great pains to point out that the Principle of Charity should take precedence. Without that all this is just smug nitpicking bullshit. I've never heard of it since, which seems telling.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But they are important. Someone can admit to disagree “just because” but if they’re trying to argue and present their opinions as facts, then they must be aware of the logical fallacies.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Responses proving you right are a twitter standard it seems.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also love how these sorts of people usually only focus on the informal ones? Like those ones are somehow worse?
-
Well they usually don't know any formal logic so...
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Beware the fallacy fallacy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ναι σκαπιλιάτα αλλά όταν γράφω εγώ τέτοια κοροϊδεύεις, στον εξιστένσιαλ που είναι φίρμα κοκοκο
-
εσύ παρασύρεσαι από κάποιους βερμπαλισμούς. Ο Εξιστένσιαλ έχει μαθηματική σκέψη στην πραγματικότητα
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.