I want to know what folks want, Beyoncé and Rihanna donate millions to different causes and people, but people still get mad. What do you think is a better solution?
-
-
That’s nothing more than a tax break and a way to trick y’all into thinking they’re woke capitalists. I want them to open their purses and put money directly into our pockets. Simple, really.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I’ve yet to see somebody explain what redistributing wealth looks like tangibly if charity doesn’t count.
- Show replies
-
-
-
That’s not redistributing wealth. Don’t be obtuse
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Redistribution would result in a diminished net worth of these folks and would require a commitment to not wealth hoard in the future. Ideally it would begin with starting with moving 10% of assets to people x orgs until the $, land etc has been spent down.
-
I also want to note that if Beyonce committed to redistributing all her assets alone, she'd still have access to a billion dollars. That's is wildly unacceptable and makes the call for her specifically to redistribute her wealth very reasonable.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Do you know how small those donations are compared to how much they have? The issue is that the are hoarding wealth while people are dying because they don’t have money, proper redistribution means they wouldn’t be billionaires
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Your definition of redistributing is philanthropy and that’s wrong.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.