Great write up. Any detail or thoughts about how decisions are communicated and what constraints members may have around discussing processes publicly? Anticipate a scenario where board members grow frustrated with inability to respond to cases outside initial parameters.
-
-
-
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I appreciate the recognition that leaving material up can restrict meaningful freedom just as much as a decision to take it down. They are both decisions, not defaults. This structure reinforces Silicon Valley’s allegiance to the myth of inevitability & public helplessness.
-
And this. “My concerns about this Supreme Court are exemplified by reference to its mandate — to review so-called “moderation practices” rather than to question the underlying business models giving rise to the need for so much moderation.”https://medium.com/@nturkewitz_56674/facebooks-supreme-court-the-erosion-of-democracy-9c02fa88db77 …
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Evelyn, would you follow me for a PM? Thank you!
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Interesting that the purview is limited both by the type of content and the action taken in regards to the content. On one axis you have individual content pieces, pages, groups, etc. On the other you have "left up," "taken down," and "downranked."
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
