evelyn douek

@evelyndouek

Aussie struggling with °F and online speech issues. SJD Words Affiliate RT=endorsement of all possible interpretations

Vrijeme pridruživanja: travanj 2009.

Medijski sadržaj

  1. 31. sij

    Facebook to do more about coronavirus misinformation. That's good! I hope efforts are matched w/ transparency so we (& by 'we', I mean researchers much smarter than me) can learn more abt how this stuff spreads and what to do abt it proactively & offline

  2. 29. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    .... looks like this might be something they're gonna need to work out?

  3. 29. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima

    Facebook can review for privacy where no consent provided

  4. 29. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Yup, public decisions and a body of "case law" will develop.

  5. 29. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima

    Issue of how amicii would know also, as you highlight, also an issue. Cases not listed on the website, it doesn't seem, until decision made. Only the person involved notified 👇 They should change this too.

  6. 29. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    This is something I think is a real weakness right now. Currently, bylaws only foresees amicus briefs by request of the board. I think the board should change that.

  7. 29. sij

    And another call just today for companies and gvt to work more closely together, this time from Warren. Let's be clear -- we're talking about political speech here. Cooperation might be necessary, but it needs to be carefully designed and with oversight

    Prikaži ovu nit
  8. 29. sij

    Good move by Pinterest, banning misinformation about voting & the census. This quote stood out 👇 There's an urgent conversation we need to have about when and how we want companies to work together. (paper for on this out soon)

    Prikaži ovu nit
  9. 28. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Yes! Article 1, s 4 :)

  10. 20. sij

    Really important work on Facebook's "coordinated inauthentic behavior" takedowns here And the key point to me 👇 Discourse around this is so militaristic but it's a real free speech blind spot

  11. 17. sij

    Great reporting from here "Australia Won't Ban Manifestos Similar To The Christchurch Shooter's Because They Didn't Go As Viral" AVM dfn would *not* include manifestos. Commissioner shd know this. And virality shd not determine legality.

  12. 12. pro 2019.

    Lots more in there. It's an impressive and important report. Kudos for Fb for commissioning it - now they need to respond and implement it. Overall, the report shares my cautious optimism about the project. /FIN

    Prikaži ovu nit
  13. 12. pro 2019.

    Further to this, the report notes that actually incorporating the Board's proposals will be necessary to uphold Fb's responsibility not to repeat human rights violations. /11

    Prikaži ovu nit
  14. 12. pro 2019.

    Wholeheartedly agree with this though - I'm okay with the Board's policy recs not necessarily being binding, but there needs to be a requirement to formally respond (this is in the Charter) and a timeline for doing so (this is not) /10

    Prikaži ovu nit
  15. 12. pro 2019.

    Another clear sign this was a truly independent review - recs that the Board be consulted on policy changes (Fb prob wouldn't love this!). I don't know I agree - I think Fb should consult other experts, while the Board is a separate body that "checks" decisions retrospectively /9

    Prikaži ovu nit
  16. 12. pro 2019.

    Critical - so much so that even technically out of scope the report makes the point that the Board doesn't absolve Fb of the need to provide meaningful appeals more generally /7

    Prikaži ovu nit
  17. 12. pro 2019.

    One of the biggest issues is that we can't escape Facebook's impact, even if we leave Facebook. Here's a simple rec to address that: even non-users should be able to bring cases. I would go even broader and allow 3rd parties to bring cases on behalf of affected ppl: /6

    Prikaži ovu nit
  18. 12. pro 2019.

    Striking proposal for Oversight Board's power to go beyond mere declarations and policy recs, and have bigger remedial jurisdiction incl. $$$. I'm not sure how I feel abt this, when the Board will only hear a small fraction of cases, but in v. serious cases it cld be imp. /5

    Prikaži ovu nit
  19. 12. pro 2019.

    Hugely important, simple and impactful recommendation: users should be provided with support and a "user advocate" in cases. Facebook will be a "repeat player" in cases - users should not be disadvantaged bc of this or any other lack of resources /4

    Prikaži ovu nit
  20. 12. pro 2019.

    A huge and welcome theme of the report is the need to focus on vulnerable groups, noting the difficulty, intersectionality and contextuality of determining this. Imp. to note that this (& other recs) is a rec for the Board, which Facebook cannot and should not control /3

    Prikaži ovu nit

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·