John Protevi's Blog: Lecture notes on Louise Barrett, _Beyond the Brain_http://proteviblog.typepad.com/protevi/2018/01/lecture-notes-on-louise-barrett-beyond-the-brain.html …
-
-
Replying to @JohnProtevi
As you know, I think we should reclaim “representation” as a cogsci term, rather than getting rid of it. I think that’s one of the only enactivist quirks I worry about ;-)
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @NeuroYogacara @JohnProtevi
The enactivist criticism of "representations" assumes that reps have to be propositional. But that's not true!
4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
(1) No, it doesn't assume this. It assumes that reps are internal states (vehicles) that encode (carry) contents; these don't have to be prop contents.
3:33 PM - 14 Jan 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.