What do you think neuroscience Twitter?https://twitter.com/evantthompson/status/939537226848800768 …
-
-
Replying to @neuroconscience
You find interesting arguments in the damnedest places. At the end of War and Peace Tolstoy has this lovely argument about how mechanistic analysis is pre-scientific, because it is concerned with particular causes, where science should seek general laws. https://biblio.wiki/wiki/War_and_Peace/Second_Epilogue …
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @JCSkewesDK @neuroconscience
That said, Bechtel has a go at defending a conception of mechanism that should be up
@evantthompson's alley http://mechanism.ucsd.edu/~bill/research/bechtel.biologicalmechanismsorganization.pdf …1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Bechtel's paper is excellent and very helpful. See this one too by Silberstein and Chemero. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/674533?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.