I'm rereading this brilliant book, published almost exactly a hundred years ago (June 1920). Science and philosophy still haven't fully learned what this book has to teach us. @Alf_N_Whitehead The Concept of Nature: Tarner Lectureshttps://www.cambridge.org/core/books/concept-of-nature/25B361C16417842783605069C21AD1F6#.XrG5yxijQYI.twitter …
-
-
Replying to @evantthompson @Alf_N_Whitehead
Si far as I know he way not a Christian nor did he have any proximities to any of the judeo christian religions. How could he, when his philosohy postulates that universe is made of procesess not objects or individuals. There is nothing to save or resurrect
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ironmann66 @evantthompson
Christian? Not in any way recognizable to most Christians, as God in process ontology is a creature of Creativity like the rest of us. However, Jesus marks a very important shift toward loving persuasion and away from force as our dominant image of divine power.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
As Christian as some modern Buddhists are Buddhists, which is the relevant comparison here
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.