I'm rereading this brilliant book, published almost exactly a hundred years ago (June 1920). Science and philosophy still haven't fully learned what this book has to teach us. @Alf_N_Whitehead The Concept of Nature: Tarner Lectureshttps://www.cambridge.org/core/books/concept-of-nature/25B361C16417842783605069C21AD1F6#.XrG5yxijQYI.twitter …
-
-
I desagree. The points of agreement are too much to simply denied it, not only with Whitehead but with physics or biology. Yes Budhism is a religion and they have there stuff there, but the core, for exámple of Huayen philosohy, is excepcional, simply because
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
https://www.religion-online.org/article/can-whitehead-be-made-a-christian-philosopher/ …. the christianity of Whitehead is very doubtful, but what is clear to me, is that his philosophy its not christian
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You could not find any other example, at léast in the wéstern world, I’m talking of religions with so many similarities or analogies or whatever you want to call it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.