I am endlessly baffled by 4E theorists who argue that "embodiment" is somehow the unique domain of humans, as if particular machines don't always have bodies situated in particular contexts. Let's talk about Dreyfus' critique of AI! (Megathread)https://twitter.com/EvanSelinger/status/1230143556913893377 …
-
-
Yes, all of the *good* 4E theorists avoid this mistake =) I'm a big fan of Tom Froese's work on enactive AI! http://bit.ly/2V8jFBX I am curious about your thoughts on how the Dreyfus-Heidegger arguments meets up with (good) enactivism?
-
Froese's paper is excellent. For me, the meeting place is the critique of representationist thinking and recognition of the need for a properly grounded account of intentionality.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Isn’t there stuff on enactive robotics from Di Paolo and crew as well? I haven’t read much of that stuff closely, so I could be wrong...
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.