And philosophers haven't proved that it exists!
-
-
-
Someone once said that philosophy truly begins when you bracket the positing of existence.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
All the various conceptions of free will seem valid. Except for the one that oddly claims we select behaviors from a platter of exactly equal options (and could have selected differently)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A different pay grade, I think.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Conventionally existent/real!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It again depends on how you define and frame the question of FW, this article make no exception. Definitions like the one of
@SamHarrisOrg, with the help of science, help to dispel some intuitions about ourselves that many take for granted.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Existenz in man is that which in the world is an unconditioned cause of itself. However, this unconditional freedom itself is born of Transcendence; Existenz knows that it is given to itself by Transcendence. — Karl Jaspers
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"free will, soberly speaking, can be defined as the capacity for intentional agency, choice among alternative possibilities" - yes but the boarders, flexibility and efficiency of this capacity are not our free choice. so basically there's no free will.
-
1st sensible comment. If anyone can present evidence of *anything* not physical (energy-matter-information), they'll likely win a Nobel along with ~ a million bucks. Heredity & experiences: electro-chem. (memories & eval. filters.) Future unpredictable, but responses are caused.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.