This (perfectly sensible question) made me realise that top-down/bottom-up is completely the wrong conceptualisation. Perception doesn’t happen wherever top and bottom meet; perception is what happens when these things are coupled and runninghttps://twitter.com/JRISundvall/status/1229166634327252996 …
-
-
Replying to @PsychScientists
Is there another way to phrase this? I'm having a hard time staying on track: it seems to me that the eco approach says there is no "filling in" from "the top down", but this would imply there is and it is coupled with "bottom up" which sounds... standard?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.