World. Very much in line with Nagaryunas Void, the absence of any pre existing entities before observation, mutual interprenation of all things. Etc. There are several potential paralels recognized by people like Heisenberg, Pauli, Bohm, Wigner,Schodringer
I think we're going round in circles. I've given my reasons for thinking the kind of reasoning you're using here doesn't work. You can read my book if you want to see these reasons in more precise and detailed terms.
-
-
Yes ok. Don’t ge exhausted. I will not to continue to bother you. Only I don’t know if have some knowledge about one of the cutting edge fields of investigation in physics now, which is the non pertubative bootstrap
-
If you're interested in the physics & Buddhist philosophy connection, see this upcoming event https://events.berkeley.edu/index.php/calendar/sn/bs.html?event_ID=129754&date=2020-04-17&filter=Event%20Type&filtersel= …
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Created by one of my heroes Jefrey Chew, today deceased, during the sixties. I will send the you the words he said when he found out the similiratiies wiht some Budhists concepts. Basically for the boottrap thing, there are no fundamental particles, no
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No fundamental equations, no primitives of any kind. Only relationships. One could derive laws, particles, only by the need of nature to be consistent witth itself. Atlas least Chew and othes found this concepts similar to you know who
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.