Pundits’ predictions for next ‘normal science paradigm’ in cognitive science! Big call - I’m not (yet) convinced 4E and FEP dovetail - the Helmholtzian nature of FEP seems out of step with the ecological/autopoietic basis of 4E.https://twitter.com/rplevy/status/1204108786677346304 …
-
-
Replying to @SRHAstraea
I do agree that the Helmholtzian and Gibsonian parts of the story are in tension with one another though
@JBruineberg et al's paper defusea that tension by giving up on Helmholz -- so it's FEP without active inference.1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
4E but not FEP. It’s fundamentally flawed. Wrong notion of information. More on this soon.
3 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @mljanderson @carl_b_sachs and
Please send me anything you write about this. I'm working on this now too with Ezequiel Di Paolo and Randy Beer.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @evantthompson @mljanderson and
If you want my take, I’ll send it probably by the end of the week, or early next week! (Not directly on this issue, but certainly related)
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
Replying to @NeuroYogacara @mljanderson and
Yes, please do send. I'm eager to see.
7:28 AM - 10 Dec 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.