Reading Buddhist philosophy means that I encounter far more discussions of Heidegger than I ever thought I would. I’ll give you Husserl, but Heidegger? Come on...pic.twitter.com/aTvfARlsQV
-
-
And with the arguments that you make, from Avery different direction, in Ch3 of Why I’m not a Buddhist. I’m doing a bit of writing on my reply to this stuff (especially given the way that we converge on allostatic regulation) in the part of the book I’m writing now!
-
Also, have I told you about the project that
@HaymanG is going to do for her dissertation? She’s drawing together stuff on dreamless sleep, embodiment, and bio-regulation...it’s gonna be wicked cool! - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
These arguments do fit nicely together. Unrelated to Dan's article, Evan. I finally have time to read your article "What's in a Concept," I am midway through, and it is by far the best thing I did this week.
-
Thanks. The new improved version will come out in a festschrift for Mark Siderits.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
