4/7 You say "x-Buddhism" is anything & everything under the label "Buddhist." How can you presume to know the scope of your (totalizing) term? How do you know "non-B" doesn't fall under it? What justifies your standpoint?
Yes, but if your project depends on him, and his project is no good, then that's going to be a problem for your project
-
-
It doesn't "depend on him"! If you understand Laruelle, you understand that he provides materials for usage vis a vis local knowledges. So, non-buddhism uses certain ideas from non-philosophy, but in a (necessarily) distinct way from what Laruelle or anyone else might do.
-
And your mere assertion (largely uninformed, I suspect) that his project is "no good" does not make it so! Again, who cares about Laruelle? On to non-buddhism!
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.