Finally, a goddamned academic! Fist pump to Robert Sharf.https://twitter.com/Sciamanoinglese/status/1145704889131003904 …
-
-
6/7 I.e. it belongs to the Buddhist tradition to question what "Buddhism" means (but you already presume to know what it designates, hence your term "x-Buddhism")
-
7/7 I think that Buddhist philosophy along with its ancient and modern dialectical interlocutors is better/richer for these issues than Laruelle, who seems pretentious and obscurantist to me
- 13 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Right, and they all fail to accomplish their aim because they must, in the end, uphold the principle of sufficient buddhism. My book is full of such examples from the history of Buddhism, including Zen and Madhyamaka. Non-buddhism hews closely to x-buddhism.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.