Is there a difference that makes a difference between saying that enactive computations are not representational *at all* and saying that they are not semantic or symbolic representations, but rather iconic representations? @joe_dewhurst @danwilliamsphil
-
Show this thread
-
Follow-up thought: are second-order cybernetic systems Turing computable? It seems that von Foerster, Maturana, and Varela would say that they are not but I'm not sure as to why.
@evantthompson6 replies 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread
Replying to @carl_b_sachs
See also this paper by Chemero and Turvey: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.210.2231&rep=rep1&type=pdf …
12:22 PM - 15 Jun 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
4 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.