Why there is no 'hard problem' of #consciousness @mpigliucci
He dismisses illusionism too quickly. But the argument is bang on. Particularly problematic for certain scientific theories of consciousness that take the hard problem as a starting point
https://philosophynow.org/issues/99/What_Hard_Problem …
-
-
Thanks, Evan. I agree (of course!) that enactivism and panpsychism are compatible. I go a bit further & argue that Whitehead’s process-relational version is a natural extension into ontology of what enactivism says about biological systems...
-
I’d also add, in response to your conclusion regarding “intrinsic properties,” that Whitehead’s relational approach distinguishes him from Strawson et al’s approach. He is very much aligned with your own Madhyamika approach where phenomenal experience is intrinsically relational.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Thank you, I look forward to checking this out!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.