the cdc data is about cases above the baseline rate, that is we’re controlling for the background rate of myocarditis - something continually debunked screening studies of a bunch of Sars2 positives aren’t doing.
-
-
Replying to @eugyppius1
"For 18-to-24-year-olds, who had received 9.8 million doses, there were 196 cases of myocarditis and pericarditis reported, compared to an expected eight to 83 cases." The absolute risk level increase is basically nothing. Driving to the vaccine clinic is more dangerous.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @stoneagenathan
10-100x the risk in the 21-day window, as i said in the op. you know what is also a low absolute risk level increase for 18-24 year-olds? actually getting Corona. it’s so low that the vaxx faces extremely steep safety demands, to be of any use to healthy members of this cohort
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @eugyppius1
2-25X the risk, which is initially practically zero. Again, you're picking the Chinese bioweapon with practically zero difference in absolute risk.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @stoneagenathan
Look, it‘s a small point, but try to understand: The myocarditis risk from mRNA vaxx is higher after dose 2 than after dose 1. So if you compare all doses across 18-24 year-olds, you see lower (still elevated) risk, but if you look at just dose 2 recipients, you see higher risk
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @eugyppius1
On an absolute level the risk is still basically zero after the second dose. It's amazing to me that people would prefer the Chinese bioweapon. And BTW, if you don't get vaccinated, you will catch it or one of the variants eventually.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @ifadag @eugyppius1
I mean, I trust Pfizer more than the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Chinese Communist Party, yes. It's not a great choice, admittedly.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @ifadag @eugyppius1
I don't think it was purposefully released. It was definitely engineered and the scientists were working with the CCP military. You can draw your own conclusions from that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
almost certainly it was developed in the course of a vaccine research program
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.