eugyppius

No. 1) uncontrolled cohort study, very similar 2) to previous surveys that have failed to replicate or fallen apart, and 3) you don't get to compare prevalence in a mostly symptomless cohort whose myocarditis was detected via MRI to prevalence in VAERS reports.

Where's the controlled cohort study for the vaccines? Also, the prevalence from the vaccines is 12.6 per million. But if you want to take your chances with an engineered Chinese bioweapon good luck.

the cdc data is about cases above the baseline rate, that is we’re controlling for the background rate of myocarditis - something continually debunked screening studies of a bunch of Sars2 positives aren’t doing.

"For 18-to-24-year-olds, who had received 9.8 million doses, there were 196 cases of myocarditis and pericarditis reported, compared to an expected eight to 83 cases." The absolute risk level increase is basically nothing. Driving to the vaccine clinic is more dangerous.

10-100x the risk in the 21-day window, as i said in the op. you know what is also a low absolute risk level increase for 18-24 year-olds? actually getting Corona. it’s so low that the vaxx faces extremely steep safety demands, to be of any use to healthy members of this cohort

2-25X the risk, which is initially practically zero. Again, you're picking the Chinese bioweapon with practically zero difference in absolute risk.

Look, it‘s a small point, but try to understand: The myocarditis risk from mRNA vaxx is higher after dose 2 than after dose 1. So if you compare all doses across 18-24 year-olds, you see lower (still elevated) risk, but if you look at just dose 2 recipients, you see higher risk

On an absolute level the risk is still basically zero after the second dose. It's amazing to me that people would prefer the Chinese bioweapon. And BTW, if you don't get vaccinated, you will catch it or one of the variants eventually.