eugyppius

The higher fertility of (mostly religious) conservatives is an undeniable political force, it’s why the predicted triumph of a wholly secular leftist society never quite comes about. These dynamics need more time.

Fertility doesn’t matter if 9/10 children attend public school

I hold the very unpopular view that nurture (including schooling) counts for almost nothing in longer-term. With caveats, obv: Convincing kids to sterilise themselves will not come out in the wash, which is likely one reason the trans stuff is getting pushed so hard.

And as current silliness solidifies its gains its own professed love of people being "different" backfires, and results in ppl wanting out of what they will (in time) see as the mainstream "trend." See g0rls praising stay at home wifehood on t1kt0k, paul brothers, etc

People aren’t natural rebels, instead they adapt to the stronger horse (culture vs family) People will continue to “rebel” by cutting their genitals off and supporting communism

For awhile no doubt. But there's always a vanguard that ARE natural rebels, which the masses follow. Being a US commie in the 50s was very rebellious, and by the 60s it was "cool." That wasn't because the avg person is rebellious, they just followed a (lame) vanguard.

We’ve seen this cultural rebel shift leftward since the 1960s, at most your rebellion will be Zoomer nihilism (i.e it doesn’t care about Wokism) which will just stagnate the progression rather than end it.

Yes, I agree, rebellion alone will not shift the culture, nor offer a useful alternative. Rebels need to be offered a powerful alternative, and that's what the task of the coming decades is. Rebels are a latent population that can facilitate change, they aren't the change itself