eugyppius

Why is White genocide a losing discussion point? Because its just a reaction to the dominant discourse: "blaqs and joos and indians are getting traction talking about their ethnic woes, mayb I can get a piece of that pie too."https://twitter.com/_forest_seeker_/status/1392504677313376258 …

Ethnic handwringing is their game, this is very important! 2 questions: 1. Why would you assume they'd allow you to play their game? 2. Why would you want to play their game in the first place? Do your own thing, play your own game, don't try recreate other peoples' shtick.

Here's what I'd say to white "genocide" ppl: A: The term "genocide" is a recent invention and not historically valuable, don't use it. B: Don't fall into the trap of thinking demographic change necessitates some sort of "breeding competition" with other ppls, that's goofy stuff.

Disagree with B. It can change without breeding but the breeding conception is the overall fight.

Its quality over quantity, having 10 kids vs some Guatemalan's 8 is silly, that can be their strategy, but it shouldn't be white peoples' move. The answer to the "breeding" issue is to be selective about immigration, not getting into a race with the ppl you brought in

Once you abandon modern democratic pieties, it's easy to see that political power is not a majority-wins kind of game. Not even in democracies is that true, or Euro-descended majorities wouldn't be losing right now (which they are).

What you need is a few people with cultural confidence, in-group loyalty, and clear-eyed political goals. In the short term, fertility rates aren't a crisis. In the long term, they will be self-correcting, as people who have more kids are always selected for.

That *was* true, at points in history. The problem is that such selection effects should’ve already kicked in if that’s true, considering how long contraception has been available