You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
5. ... the more probable hypothesis would seem to be that the pangolins were not the ordinary host for this virus; and that they picked it up somewhere in the animal-smuggling chain. That is of course if you believe this story is real.
6. After Corona hit, a small group of (mostly Chinese) papers started pointing to pangolins as a possible animal intermediary. The virus sequences they presented were all more or less ripped from the 2019 paper. To varying degrees they all obfuscated this.https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.07.07.184374v2.full …
7. Most would believe that the zoonotic (natural) hypothesis of Corona's origins requires an animal intermediary, to get the virus from bats to humans. Some might find it odd that the only evidence of such an intermediary was published a few months before the outbreak ...
8. Other pangolin samples have turned up Coronaviruses, and even some SARS-related ones, but none with the anomalous spike protein.
"We have a corpse. Quick, find some poor sap to hold this smoking gun ..."
If it's not simple plagiarism, the purpose of the obfuscation in these 2020 studies seems to be to create the impression that this pangolin SARS virus with the special spike has been found more than just once. i.e., that it might be some kind of ordinary pangolin virus.pic.twitter.com/4ZfZCiPQ1w
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
