1. The whole pangolin-as-intermediary theory rests on one single sequenced pangolin SARS-CoV virus, published in Fall 2019 by Guangdong virologists, who were sampling pangolins that had been seized from smugglers that Spring. Nobody has ever found a pangolin virus like that againhttps://twitter.com/UngeheuerDarin/status/1401992628028297218 …
-
-
4. The pangolins were severely ill with SARS-like symptoms and most of them died within a few months of their seizure. Given that nobody has been able to find this mysterious virus in any pangolin ever again (and I assure you, it's not for want of trying) ...
Show this thread -
5. ... the more probable hypothesis would seem to be that the pangolins were not the ordinary host for this virus; and that they picked it up somewhere in the animal-smuggling chain. That is of course if you believe this story is real.
Show this thread -
6. After Corona hit, a small group of (mostly Chinese) papers started pointing to pangolins as a possible animal intermediary. The virus sequences they presented were all more or less ripped from the 2019 paper. To varying degrees they all obfuscated this.https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.07.07.184374v2.full …
Show this thread -
7. Most would believe that the zoonotic (natural) hypothesis of Corona's origins requires an animal intermediary, to get the virus from bats to humans. Some might find it odd that the only evidence of such an intermediary was published a few months before the outbreak ...
Show this thread -
8. Other pangolin samples have turned up Coronaviruses, and even some SARS-related ones, but none with the anomalous spike protein.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.