Here, Drosten says he finds lab origins "improbable," because SARS-2 does not derive from a known (SARS-1) DNA backbone – an argument ripped straight from the 17 March 2020 Andersen letter in Nature. That's how lazy our Science propaganda is here.https://www.republik.ch/2021/06/05/herr-drosten-woher-kam-dieses-virus …
-
Show this thread
-
This is the equivalent of saying "That house can't have been built by humans, it corresponds to no published blueprints" A desperate stretch concocted at the start of th epandemic by virologists to defend their profession, now reported as the sum of Drosten's considered opinionpic.twitter.com/2r3H4XBgU0
1 reply 3 retweets 17 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @eugyppius1
Here is Kristian Andersen questioning the sequencing...https://virological.org/t/novel-2019-coronavirus-genome/319/23 …
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.