Now the emperors try to solve the MQ (Monophysite Question) in 2 ways: 1) By persecuting the Monophysites and installing 'orthodox' Chalcedonian bishops at key sees; and 2) by trying to develop compromise doctrines that will please both sides.
-
Show this thread
-
Heraclius, with help from Patriarch Sergius I of Constantinople, comes up with Monoenergism, as a thing that is supposed to unite everyone.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
Monoenergism holds that, yes the Word has two natures – but don't worry, Monophysites! He also as *one energy*. The idea, I gues, is that if Christ can still have one of something, the Monophysites might be satisfied.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
As soon as Heraclius wins the war with Persia, he begins promoting Monoenergism officially. The problem is that a gaggle of important people, including the Patriarch of Jerusalem, don't like it.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
The problem with compromise doctrines, is they don't have any adherents out there in the wild. What's worse, the reception isn't just lukewarm. It provokes a huge new destructive debate over Christ's energies and their precise number.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
By AD 638, Heraclius abandons monoenergism. He issues the Ecthesis, a hilarious statement that tells everyone to shut up and never discuss Christ's energies ever again.
5 replies 1 retweet 13 likesShow this thread -
Instead, the Ecthesis declares, everyone is now to believe that Christ has two natures (Chalcedon position) but – wait for it – *one will*.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
This is monotheletism. Surprisingly, it satisfies the eastern patriarchs, including the Patriarch of Jerusalem, but it finds a new opponent in the Bishop of Rome. Now Eastern & Western churches are fighting and Heraclius dies full of regret about the mess he started.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
Maximos the Confessor, an African monk, joins forces with the Pope & you have Lateran Council of 649 condemning monotheletism at great length The whole mess is finally cleaned up, formally by the Third Council of Constantinople (AD 680/1) ...
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @eugyppius1
Controversy with Maximus and Pope Martin is interesting because it shows reach Byzantine Empire still had in Rome in this period, mid 7th century. Always unclear to me which colored areas in historical maps really represent effective political control.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Prominent Greek-speaking communities & monasteries in Rome itself (and all over Italy), place must have had a pronounced between-two-worlds feel about it at the time.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.