I very much disagree that it‘s difficult to evade detection. In general the capabilities of forensic pathologists are hugely overestimated
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @2xminus1 @eugyppius1
But it's not suspicious because we invented a name specifically to clear them: SIDS
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @2xminus1 @realbaizuo
there isn’t necessarily any criminal investigation, it’s a diagnosis of exclusion.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @2xminus1 @eugyppius1
Certainly; maybe an analogy is in order: The passing of terminally sick elderly is sometimes eased along with a little more morphine than strictly necessary. Nobody bats an eye in these cases, we even never know for certain.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @realbaizuo @2xminus1
SIDS is a diagnostic category that expressly permits the sudden unexplained death of an infant not to be subjected to further investigation. you understand there is no way to differentiate from “stopped breathing” and “was smothered” in the absence of bruising/ other injury
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
again, your faith in forensic pathology is too strong. mothers of many species who experience stress after giving birth will kill or abandon their young. SIDS is a way for authorities to look the other way when there are no overt injuries & she seems like a nice woman
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.