Now another precondition, which I don't to spoil too much in this introductory throat clearing, because there's a lot to say about it. I mean the whole problem of the Monophysites vs. the Chalcedonians.
-
Show this thread
-
This is a huge religious divide that splits the Eastern Roman Empire in half. In the east, the ancient patriarchal sees at Antioch and Alexandria believe that Christ had *one nature*, namely a divine one.
1 reply 1 retweet 14 likesShow this thread -
The patriarch at Constantinople, however, is further West, and he believes that Christ had *two natures*, a divine and a human one. This was also what the monumentally crucial Council of Chalcedon had decreed in AD 451.
1 reply 1 retweet 15 likesShow this thread -
The emperors generally fall under the sway of the patriarch of Constantinople and profess Chalcedonian orthodoxy, but sometimes – as under Justinian – they seem less than totally convinced.
1 reply 1 retweet 14 likesShow this thread -
(Theodora, Justinian's whoar wife, has Monophysite sympathies.)
1 reply 1 retweet 15 likesShow this thread -
It sounds perhaps like an arcane theological dispute to you, but it mattered graetly to many ordinary people on the ground. As big, or bigger, than the Roman Catholic vs. Protestant divide in 15th/16th centuries. Of huge political significance.
2 replies 1 retweet 18 likesShow this thread -
Again, we will talk more this in the course of the coming week, but you need to keep in mind that the territories that the eastern empire loses, in the Disaster of the 7th Century, are predominantly Monophysite.
1 reply 1 retweet 13 likesShow this thread -
This is also a cornerstone of important conspiracy theories we will come to entertain.
2 replies 1 retweet 19 likesShow this thread -
Finally, just a broader cultural note about the steady transition from classical antiquity to a more mediaeval world. This is an era in which there is a general movement, away from civic political structure, to more overt apolitical religious expression.
2 replies 1 retweet 15 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @eugyppius1
An interesting thing to notice: the decline of empires generally seems to show a hollowing of civil society. This is remarked in late antiquity, in Mughal India, in the Soviet Union, & in the United States. Maybe elsewhere, too, but these are my study of late.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
absolutely, empires depend above all on civilians.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.