eugyppius

I would've been polite if his very first response to my simple opinion wasn't an insult. After that, why bother with decorum. It's clear where he's taking things.

"I might be policing your language and attitude, but at least I didn't lead off with rude words" lol

I'm not policing anything. I gave a simple opinion, in no way said anything antagonistic, didn't disagree on the premise, was just thinking pragmatically. His response wasn't to disagree it was to try to belittle me. So the bad guy is the guy who takes exception with the bully?

If this is a good faith interpretation of what you thought you were saying, then I'm sorry that nobody else interpreter it that way.

Literally all I said was it would reach more people if the language was a little less caustic. The response was to make fun of me. I tried to respond, received more harassment. Then an implied dox threat to me that got deleted. Really?

Could you apply a little exegesis to this clause for me: "with the insecure bath water"?

So the explanation for insecure bath water is if his assertions have merit, which they do, why say things that make you look like an insecure bigot? Maybe he isn't, but he's presenting that way. Why? I have no clue!

There's the admission against interest. Case closed. I'm outta here.