You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
In this clip, Merkel suggests a new means of calculating the 7-day incidence (which determines lockdowns & other restrictions). After 50% are fully vaxxed, an incidence of 100 should be seen in fact as an incidence of 200 for the unvaxxed. Things just always get crazier, here.https://twitter.com/rosenbusch_/status/1387023931517935618 …
If you continue to think in this way, lockdowns will never end. Some of the vaccinated will of course carry the disease and test positive, and as the unvaxxed shrink in proportion, relatively few infections will lead to insanely high lockdown-triggering incidences.
lol, it just gets ridiculously absurd where she says we still have substantial risk for our health care systems. since we have introduced an upper bound for total infections through vaccinating half the people, this is plain wrong.
Hey cool so if 99% are vaxxed then an incidence of 1 should be treated as seriousness-equivalent to an incidence of 100. I love math
This will truly push me over the edge if this measure is adopted. It would be inexcusable. No more benefit of the doubt
I imagine a good setup for a dystopian short story. There is only a single unvaccinated man. The incidence can be either 0% or 100% at the whims of the PCR false positive rate.
This is our world now.
Segregation vaxx vs unvaxxed?
Obviously you will never have the vaccination status for the new cases . 
of course not, i mean that goes without saying.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
