About 1 in 10 of all people, less so for the young most likely, but let's say it's 1/100, it would still be way worse. Watch Myles Garrett gasping for air after running, and that's a young world class athlete.https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/the-tragedy-of-the-post-covid-long-haulers-2020101521173 …
-
-
So that harvard health blog appears to cite only one actual study, where they interviewed people 2-3 weeks after positive PCR test results and found that 35% still hadn't returned to baseline health. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7392393/ …pic.twitter.com/yoznVnUsPi
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @eugyppius1 @Facebooktown1 and
All the long covid stuff is like this, vague inflated claims gathering the usual pool of fibromyalgia-adjacent symptoms under the umbrella of "long covid" and padding out the numbers with people who still have lingering feelings of exhaustion 2-3 weeks later ...
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @eugyppius1 @Facebooktown1 and
...which is also the case for many who have had influenza, btw. Not doubting that some patients have permanent pulmonary damage from viral pneumonia, but the number is nowhere near 1/10. Also there is good evidence for persistent attenuated smell some people.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It could 1/100, still way worse than heart inflammation which you will likely get from covid itself. Plus time off work, and god help you if you lost your job to covid and have to stay in the hospital. Life over.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
You are vastly overestimating the risk from Corona infection, which is understandable, given the year-long media propaganda campaign.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
But once the media is reporting on 6 of 100k alleged inflamed hearts they are no longer fear mongering but relevant facts? Gotta pick one. I dont listen to the media, I listen to medical professionals.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yes, thanks, I want to explain my reasoning more here. 1) This is *one* side-effect, in a demographic cohort that faces probably a 10/100k risk of death from Corona infection, and with the vaxx they have a 5-6/100k chance at myocarditis.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @eugyppius1 @Facebooktown1 and
2) But that 10/100k mortality risk is not evenly distributed among the whole cohort. It is concentrated in a few sick members. Healthy 18-30 year-olds, will have a much lower risk of death than 10/100k, but they still face myocarditis risk from the vaxx.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @eugyppius1 @Facebooktown1 and
3) We don't know how many of the 10/100k the vaxx will save in that cohort. I very much doubt it will save all of them.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
4) Included in that 18-30 cohort are people who have already recovered from Corona infection and are naturally immune.
-
-
Replying to @eugyppius1 @Facebooktown1 and
5) And in contexts where the state or medical authorities directly or indirectly compel low-risk healthy people to accept vaccination, they bear a particular moral burden for side effects like this, even if the risk calculus comes out as a wash.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I think the 6/100k(might go up, to be fair) vs. 10/100k is not apples to apples, because there is a much larger number of people who are seriously fucked up by it and dont die. Anecdotally, I know two young people who are not back to normal after having it in 2020. Enough for me
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.