eugyppius

look, whatever you believe about this, if you‘re a sincere person, you need to know @pro__lockdown is a manipulative spam account. It also runs @pro_lockdown (one underscore) and @yestolockdown — both protected since I discovered them. think sharp and keep your hat on.

Again, you’re incorrect. I’m not a “spam” account. I’m a ZeroCovid Lockdown activist. You call me out for being a “spam” account, yet you “spam” various accounts everyday. You’re a Covid denier, enough said!

where in all of my tweets do i deny covid

You also deny the methods used to combat Covid-19, you also deny #ZeroCovid which is dangerous and you’ve denied #longcovid which Amrit pointed out.

deny? i dispute the efficacy of lockdowns. i affirm that lockdowns exist, i don‘t deny them. i disagree with ZeroCovid, which is actually an ordinary mainstream position, because the ZeroCovid people have discredited themselves

as for LongCovid: i cited a paper in Nature that cast your fear mongering on this front in a rather different light. you haven‘t shown any signs of reading it, of course.

The paper which says "While this study provides insights into the clinical presentation of long COVID, there are limitations and any generalization should be considered carefully"?