Again, read your article once more, and understand why it doesn‘t address anything I‘ve said. Because some people were hoarding alcohol in August 2020 doesn‘t mean lockdowns were a net economic benefit for anyone.
-
-
The point of lockdowns is to protect life and health, without which there can be no economic activity. See e.g.https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/coronavirus-leading-through-the-crisis/charting-the-path-to-the-next-normal/countries-that-focused-on-keeping-virus-spread-near-zero-got-their-economies-moving-faster-than-others …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yet another old article from fall 2020. Look: Corona isn‘t bad enough to disrupt normal economic activity. Like MERS (and also, largely, SARS), most Corona deaths are in institutional care, people who lockdowns don‘t protect anyway.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
But most Long Covid (permanent organ damage) cases are in younger people.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
yea, bad day to make the LongCovid argument https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-021-01292-y …pic.twitter.com/QOM3VkxXBv
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @eugyppius1 @amrit_lohia and
look, whatever you believe about this, if you‘re a sincere person, you need to know @pro__lockdown is a manipulative spam account. It also runs
@pro_lockdown (one underscore) and@yestolockdown — both protected since I discovered them. think sharp and keep your hat on.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @eugyppius1 @amrit_lohia and
Again, you’re incorrect. I’m not a “spam” account. I’m a ZeroCovid Lockdown activist. You call me out for being a “spam” account, yet you “spam” various accounts everyday. You’re a Covid denier, enough said!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zerocovidzoe @amrit_lohia and
where in all of my tweets do i deny covid
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @eugyppius1 @amrit_lohia and
You also deny the methods used to combat Covid-19, you also deny
#ZeroCovid which is dangerous and you’ve denied#longcovid which Amrit pointed out.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zerocovidzoe @amrit_lohia and
deny? i dispute the efficacy of lockdowns. i affirm that lockdowns exist, i don‘t deny them. i disagree with ZeroCovid, which is actually an ordinary mainstream position, because the ZeroCovid people have discredited themselves
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
as for LongCovid: i cited a paper in Nature that cast your fear mongering on this front in a rather different light. you haven‘t shown any signs of reading it, of course.
-
-
Replying to @eugyppius1 @devisridhar and
The paper which says "While this study provides insights into the clinical presentation of long COVID, there are limitations and any generalization should be considered carefully"?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.