so i get that i place myself within your paradigms via this comment, but still i wish to say that: spencer is such an abrasive shit, of course he‘d jump on this book, which afaict from cursory internetting merely restates longstanding analyses of pauline christianity
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @periposeidion
not complaining about your tweet, just grumpy at spencer. i mean sure, christianity as we understand it descends from the letters of paul and people in his circle. that seems fairly obvious to me and it doesn‘t make the religion a ‚hoax‘ (even for me as a non-Christian)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @periposeidion
It‘s the kind of thing, I feel I know what it says. But, you know what, I‘ll actually read it, and report back.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @eugyppius1 @periposeidion
a long time ago I was at Uni, as post-Catholic, learning ancient things. I had prof who was Catholic convert, & seminar was on touched on matters like this I asked him directly: How this make you feel? And he said, mine was the fallacy of origins, an odd historian fixation.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I think about that all the time.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.