Wow. Some scientists have been so blinded by the pandemic they are unable to read.pic.twitter.com/r4z43eXUb0
-
83% *lower risk* of infection as opposed to the negative cohort. the negative cohort only had ca. 400 infections out of more than 14k participants, i.e., the risk of infection for seronegativer was already low and for seropositive it was *even lower*pic.twitter.com/nsOZ4DHgVX
what is more, of the 44 "reinfections" in the seropositive cohort, only 2 were "probable" and the rest were merely "possible" reinfections
-
-
Did you actually read it? The question was they were antibody +ve (how you get antibodies from a false +ve). As no testing in March April the question was that no PCR available in March April (500 tests a day) - it would be great to have a full sequence on both.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Are you having a bad time right now. Are things bad. That is denialism - not the people who wanted to get fact straight and be cautious if necessary.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And I wonder if you said... >its just the flu >no early March 2020 lockdown (prevented spring) >reopen June - another 3 weeks eliminated >no circuit breaker September (prevented autumn) >short slack lockdown 2 that caused now
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.