The condition originally was to prevent hospitals from being overrun and that condition magically changed a few months in
If lockdowns were real policies (and not magical fake ones), they would have clear expiration dates, & failure conditions: If infections go up despite lockdown, lockdown would be *lifted*, in the same way you stop dangerous ineffective treatments like chemo, when they don‘t work
-
-
-
There‘s always another reason you have to lock down. First, Corona is deadly. But it isn‘t, so Corona overwhelms hospitals. But it doesn‘t, so Corona reinfects you. But it doesn‘t except in rare cases, so Long Covid. But that‘s a lot of fibromyalgic females, so Long Covid Kids.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This is totally right, I have Popper allergies like the next man, but the truth is, if your approach must be so well defended that it can never fail, it already has.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’m starting to think that nothing short of revolution toppling a government somewhere, anywhere in the world, over this will make it stop
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's not really how it works What actually matters here is what people, in general, are doing when it comes to the pandemic. And the will of the people often overrides and overpowers the pen of the executive leaders For ill or for the better
-
is this a multisyllabic way of saying lockdowns don’t work because people break rules
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.