So it seems the main things driving the German propaganda ‘response’ were ‘The Hammer and the Dance’ and some expert from an institution called ‘The University of Nottingham China’
-
-
Replying to @laurent_fourier
which is exactly the dynamic (social media/murky-sourced crap -> junior staffers -> passed upward to clueless Managers wanting to Do Something) that I had been imagining/conjecturing back in April/May ‘20. But it’s still shocking to see actual evidence of it
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @soncharm @laurent_fourier
this is some of the wildest shit i’ve ever seen. coming years will only yield more of this no wonder merkel gvt is DEATH CORONA all the time. as long as everybody is terrified the likelihood of dirty laundry like this getting traction is low
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @eugyppius1 @laurent_fourier
i think others asked you this before but missed the answer (and can't read the german) - how did it come out? was it the equivalent of a 'freedom of information act' request, or was it some insider leak?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @soncharm @laurent_fourier
yeah, foia-equivalent release to this group of lawyers, but they held it close, refused to show anyone, and there was only this article in Welt. then some insider with access to the release scanned the whole thing and leaked it to the internet.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @eugyppius1 @laurent_fourier
what's crazy to me then is how much was unredacted. i suspect a FOIA attempt of this same type of stuff in the US would have redacted 3x as much under 'pre-decisional'/'internal deliberation' exceptions
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @soncharm @laurent_fourier
well, they‘re not allowed to arbitrarily redact. every black-out has a little citation to the legal provision that permits them to do this. it‘s how one can intuit which redactions are „China“ (the referenced provision is ‚could harm international relations‘).
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
if they overreach here, their redactions will be overturned in court. but, another thing is, half the correspondence is totally blacked out. the leaker (who seems to have worked in haste) only scanned the non-blacked pages.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
i strongly suspect some of the redacted pages are the ostensibly ‚secret‘ pandemic data forwarded from China by their junior prof informant from Nottingham Ningbao University.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @eugyppius1 @laurent_fourier
Also, is it known how/why this Mayer guy got in touch with the health agency in the first place? Is he just friends w/someone there? Or should we be asking whether he was also contacting CDC etc as well? (Or maybe someone like him?)
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
Kerber, the interior ministry bureaucrat, assembled this ad hoc panel to throw together their model. I need to read it again, but it seems that Mayer was known either to Kerber, or to one or more of the original panelists.
-
-
He ended up getting pulled into the discussions. He has no expertise of his own and he even admits at one point that he hasn‘t even read the material on the Chinese pandemic/response he‘s forwarding. He‘s just an intermediary.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Have now reread it. He represents some kind of "taskforce," and he was involved in the project from the start. In fact, his first email to the group is a promise that he and his team will look over the RKI preliminary model and provide criticism/suggestions.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.