This thread gives a good explanation on how the future scenario will most likely play out.https://twitter.com/stgoldst/status/1369066744145276928 …
-
-
Replying to @RealYeyoZa
he had me till the point where he said that the vaccine confers a better immunity than natural infection at which point he lost me
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
-
Replying to @RealYeyoZa @LucioMM1
He's not the first person to wander down this path of reasoning, which very soon reveals what folly it is to be (trying to) prevent harmless infections in children. Better they get it for the first time now and have some resistance when they're older.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @eugyppius1 @LucioMM1
Yeyo Retweeted Yeyo
I have long argued this is by far the most likely scenario. All the data and historical data from earlier pandemics fits.https://twitter.com/RealYeyoZa/status/1310597591797821441 …
Yeyo added,
Yeyo @RealYeyoZaThe most likely scenario. We're like an isolated tribe getting exposed to a novel virus. After first contact, subsequent waves will become less deadly. Not because the virus changes, but because our bodies will recognize the virus the second time. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4564847/ … pic.twitter.com/E9FPsaV5IBShow this thread2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
There were recurrent huge die-offs in Mexico for maybe 150 years after Cortez. The population of Mexico may have bottomed out in the late 1600s.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
If we ended up being colonised by bats, one could imagine how novel coronaviruses would be continually introduced from the colonising reservoir population and similar pattern would result.
-
-
Exactly, it was not just one novel virus being introduced, and they weren't all introduced at the same time, but gradually.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.