-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah. Customers want to pay for stuff as opposed to getting for free. If these people actually do exist,
@ElsevierConnect may just have broken the whole basis of money.
pic.twitter.com/B5rMKNKjRE
-
If people paid for things instead of wanting them for free, we would probably have a smaller advertising-surveillance complex. Freemium models & ad-supported models have their use, but...
#justsayin
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
with a 37% profit margin!?!?!?!?
-
37% is an incorrect number to cite for Elsevier’s project margin, as they do not report the profit margin, rather operating margin, which includes certain expenses. The Elsevier/UC business negotiation has many mutually desirable outcomes.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Article about rent-seeking publishers blocked by onerous over-regulation. So 2018.pic.twitter.com/XDvJrxrOWL
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As a
@UCBerkeley alum and California taxpayer, I stand with the universities. Why should we have to pay twice for access to researchThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm not sure that the $11m UC currently pays to
@ElsevierConnect for access to a database of 15m articles and 420,000 new articles every year is necessarily going to make a big dent on the problem of student debt.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
First thing academics should do is STOP submitting their work to journals run by Elsevier but this is not happening - submissions continue to increase.
-
Agreed. For my part, we’ve been submitting to eLife, society journals, and Frontiers journals.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.