-
-
-
I.e. many would argue that there are too many VCs in SF, but there certainly aren't enough VCs globally.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
More venture capital, doesn't necessarily need to be more vcs
-
totally. the inverse is true too. i'd argue that some of the benefits could be gained by distributing existing pie of VC. (Bundling & Unbundling)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Though if founders are the rate limiting step, not sure that more VC fixes anything or creates more growth. Could even hamper by distributing talent, resources more broadly across worse companies
-
Interesting. Are more VCs more or less likely to lead to more founders in your view? That more founders may not lead to more growth is a separate but also interesting claim!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Whack ratio: Americans spend almost as much money on lottery tickets each year as VCs invest.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Major VC's become way less risky compared to pre-2010 era. Hopefully more VC's, more chances some of them will go to the real early stage helping more founders to break through.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
More investments mean more risky bets, which promote innovation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Slightly off topic: why not more differenter still-private-and-profit oriented kinds of funding risky tech?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
