-
Novi razgovor
-
-
-
Critics attach their names to the review and audience is anonymous. Can’t overlook that element.
-
Far more truth in anonymity
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I found myself cringing throughout the special, but only because the jokes weren’t nearly as aggressive as those on Chapelle show but still seemed so taboo. Comedians are often on the frontlines of censorship whether from the left or right
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
If you compare Chapelle latest to other Chapelle releases, it’s probably the lowest ranking, but relative to other comedians, he’s still on another level for identifying American hypocrisy via consistent daring insight. Also, 5 specials in 2 years ... who can even approach that?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Dave chappelle has always seeked the truth and did as much in his power to show us without directly saying it
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
@eriktorenberg Are you be able to get a comedian on your podcast to talk about his/her craft. Comedy is used in business and politics but not really dissected that well: How it works? History? Difference between professional comedian and world class? Heckling? Would be
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Look at Hannah Gadsby’s Nanette: critics v audience.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Audience scores are never representative on these sites (motivated people tend to rate vs random sampling) and only 8 critic ratings. Not much to extrapolate from that.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.