In primitive societies, people were self-sufficient. They gathered food, made clothing, and found shelter. Today, no one’s self-sufficient. They’re specialized. Everything you consume—you couldn’t produce it. Your daily life depends on the cooperation of millions of others.
-
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
Imagine making, say, cereal from scratch. You’d need to grow the grains yourself, which would mean making tools, which would mean mining metals, which would mean finding metals, which would mean building machinery, etc—you get the idea.
Prikaži ovu nit -
How does this happen? Markets. Entrepreneurs constantly test new types of specialization and markets determine which specialization prospers and which dies. This isn’t dictated by a planner but from the decentralized actions of many founders testing ideas in search of profit.
Prikaži ovu nit -
Decentralized markets are able to send signals, averting surpluses and shortages and guiding inputs to their most effective use. On the contrary, a centralized system’s ability to allocate its resources is only as good as the intuition of its central planners.
Prikaži ovu nit -
The less knowledge there is, the more central planning makes sense The more knowledge there is, the more decetnrlizzed systems, notably markets, make sense. What leads to increasing knowledge? Specialization.
Prikaži ovu nit -
Zooming out: Arguably, it was possible 400 years ago for a single individual to understand what was then known about every scientific subject or to read every book— Or in other words, it was far easier back then to align knowledge and power in one central planner.
Prikaži ovu nit -
Today, there is increasing specialization across the board. New species of jobs, products, and areas of expertise are appearing at an exponentially increasing rate. The knowledge at the center is shrinking relative to knowledge at the periphery—edges of networks.
Prikaži ovu nit -
This is why we don’t have many Leonardo Da Vincis today—people who are world class at many disciplines. H/t
@jon_choi_Prikaži ovu nit -
However, as information has become more diffuse (thanks to specialization), political power has become more concentrated. Scale creep - population increases while the size of the jurisdiction remains constant Scope creep - jurisdictions undertake more + more activities each yr
Prikaži ovu nit -
One area where the divorce was uniquely felt was the financial crisis of 2008. Innovative financial instruments were understood by financial engineers (they had the knowledge), but not by executives, policymakers, and regulators (who had the power).
Prikaži ovu nit -
It’s interesting to watch knowledge & power play out in venture capital Just as one person could have understood all of physics at one point, it was possible for one person to specialize at “internet investing” and be an expert at all. Today that’s unfathomable
Prikaži ovu nit -
To put a fine point on it, back then an investor could source, diligence, and support across the board. As specialization has increased, those activities have become increasingly unbundled, and sub-categories & new experts have emerged.
Prikaži ovu nit -
Sidenote: crypto, for example, even in it’s most nascent stage, has dozens of sub categories, requiring corresponding areas of expertise. Now not just investing or sourcing. Law. Game Theory. Engineering. Math. Finance. Social Science. Product expertise.
Prikaži ovu nit -
Another side note: When ppl talk about why decentralization matters, particularly in crypto, they talk about broadening ownership, better aligning incentives, decentralizing governance, but it’s worth explicitly calling out that decentralization betters align knowledge & power
Prikaži ovu nit -
VC has unbundled significantly and yet most VC is still GPs on Sandhill rd acting as masters of the universe This is why we at VG (& others) are trying to decentralize sourcing, diligencing, and supporting—to leverage specialization and, crucially, better align knowledge & power
Prikaži ovu nit -
Broadly, specialization will only increase, following from the increase of nonzero sum behavior*, so I’m excited for next generation of decentralized organizations & markets to help aggregate and make sense of this increasing knowledge. *https://twitter.com/eriktorenberg/status/1120196466859888640 …
Prikaži ovu nit -
Increasing specialization & atomization of VC: - Sector specific funds. - Sub-sectors: “Within crypto, privacy. Within biotech, longevity." (Now 6 longevity funds!) - Functional area VCs - Specific talent pool (geo/age/URM) - Scouts unbundling sourcing, deciding, supporting
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.