By "Modern C++" I am referring to the generative, policy-based design popularized by @incomputable. C++ has continued to evolve, and I don't know what to call the dominant paradigm now.
-
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
Another way to frame the question:
@stroustrup has often said (paraphrasing) that inside C++ there is a smaller, more elegant language struggling to get out. How should we be referring to *that*? IMO, *that* is not a proper subset of the language, fwiw. I think it is a style.Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
extern "Rust"
-
Bad user. No cookie.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Ah yes, blogged about that in 2016 :D https://meetingcpp.com/blog/items/what-does-modern-c-really-mean.html …
-
Just read it. After we argue about the meaning of "modern" we can argue about the meaning of "generic".
It doesn't mean "templates".
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
C++ Nouvau.
-
I kind of like that.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Moderner C++
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.