I'm against thinking generally. Users should never have to think. We need to finish moving away from browsers to apps and give the people what they want.
-
-
-
::stab::
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Indeed what things should a user have to (or at least be able to) think about? The typical user is prepared in the physical world to make a sort of risk management decision if confronted with a trench-coat contained "popup shop" for Rolexes. Where's the digital balance?
-
A long rehash of thoughts here:https://textslashplain.com/2017/01/16/certified-malice/ …
-
This argument ultimately leads to the "evil" bit https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3514
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Ideally not, I agree! But among the set [domain names, protocols, locks/icons, and corporate registrations], domain names seem like the one that can take you the farthest. Particularly when that's the one that can be technically enforced on users' behalves via eg WebAuthN tokens.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.