This is much better if merged with the i-squared act.
Um...all things considered, this strikes me as a surprisingly acceptable proposal. Texans, what do you think? https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/25/us/politics/trump-immigration-plan-white-house.html?emc=edit_na_20180125&nl=breaking-news&nlid=59531573&ref=cta … #DACADeal
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If I could trust Trump to stick to this & not Lucy the football...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm doubtful it will happen.
-
would you be okay with it if it did, though?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Reducing legal immigration by 50%? Hell no.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It seems palatable. Funding the wall is a waste of money on a giant boondoggle. It is a project that will never be finished. The Ds should be fine with setting Trump up to fail in the long run
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s a 3x reduction in legal immigration (per
@David_J_Bier below). Seems bad but I don’t know if there’s a better deal to be had.https://twitter.com/david_j_bier/status/956650399091625984 …
-
3x per decade, I should say.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Not a Texan but the idea that the Dems would agree to reduce net migration by 50% is absolute insanity.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The better deal is saying, give us 1.8 million Dreamers, and the Dems say okay, only they won't be eligible for family reunification.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.