Anybody know of a paper that has a good graph of avg # of math authors per paper 1900-2000
Bonus if it also has a separate one for US-based mathematicians
I’ve seen a fair number of papers that have this for 1970-present but not before
Conversation
tagging you as the Prince of this area of Twitter.
Apologies if I missed an obvious paper
1
Discover more
Sourced from across Twitter
Couldn’t agree more with this piece
When I pick stories for FreakTakes (whether it’s the early era MIT crew or Edison’s ‘boys’) I’m often trying to communicate just how small group an endeavor much of the science that drove this country was
It still can be
Quote Tweet
"When all you have is a Manhattan Project, everything looks like a bomb."
@timhwang on the siren song of BIG SCIENCE
macroscience.org/p/the-seductio
2
11
Are there any areas of science where the best memorizers/finders of information have an extreme leg up in doing research?
For example, I don't get the sense this means much in algorithms research, but it seems at least moderately important in certain areas of bio
Thanks!
1
2
3
Maybe just sell it based on outcomes
Delian: Our state-of-the-art manufacturing process can carry out crystallization with negligible effects from microgravity on the mesoscopic scale
Customer: oh wow! How do you manage that?
Delian: That’s uh…that’s IP sorry.
2
2
Pic from reminded me of an excerpt from FreakTakes MIT series
A big sticking point that prevented an MIT/Harvard merger in the 1920s is MIT wanted its students to be useful to industry above all else. coddled its students at the expense of their learning
Quote Tweet
The excellent safety record of commercial aviation was only achieved incrementally, iteratively, over decades:
Show this thread
1
1
Show this thread





