"imply a kind of paranoia about true linguistic ability, an insistence that one can do so much of it so well, can learn to write like spookily like Nabokov… and yet still not be “the real thing,” not even a little bit."https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ZFtesgbY9XwtqqyZ5/human-psycholinguists-a-critical-appraisal …
Well, yes. We already knew that. It is the difference between someone who writes without knowing what they're talking about, and someone who understands what they're saying. Spookily similar, and yet one is not the real thing, not even a little bit.
-
-
Which proves that scaling this up will not result in intelligence: because it has already been scaled up, in the writings of many humans, and it did not result in intelligence.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.