Some thoughts on the Harpers letter. I support it in spirit: the world would be a better place if people could be more tolerant and open minded. But I think their argument is oversimplified to make the problem seem easier than it really is. /1
-
-
I concede the problem: race and genetics just happens to be my thing, and nowadays everyone has their own. Once you let the cancellation genie out of the bottle it’s hard to get him back in. What is to be done? /6
Show this thread -
On the one hand, we can agree with the signatories that we can all make an effort to be a little more understanding of people we disagree with. /7
Show this thread -
But the signatories could try to understand that the current boundaries of discourse-- Holocaust denialism is unacceptable, but suggesting that African people have evolved to be dumber than Europeans is a topic for civil scientific debate-- weren’t passed down on tablets. /8
Show this thread -
Those boundaries were invented, mostly by rich tenured white people like me. The cancellation debate isn’t ultimately about a commitment to civil discourse, it is a debate about where revised boundaries should lie. /end
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Not my field at all, but I am surprised to learn that anything about the heritability of complex traits is considered a closed book. I thought we were just beginning to understand these things.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is it really true that the IQ gaps between different ethnic population groups is entirely environmental and has zero genetic basis? That has been proven by science?
-
Yeah, by objective "scientists" like Kevin Bird.pic.twitter.com/7lF15F7yRh
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
When biological and genetic differences are totally removed as potential causal factors for race and gender gaps, discrimination is thought to account for them entirely. This is also harmful- it's at the core of the destructive and divisive culture war raging as we speak.
-
On the comparison with holocaust denial- Many Ashkenazi Jews believe and publish on biological differences between groups, not because they're racist but because that's where the evidence leads them - equating them to holocaust deniers is a lot like calling them race traitors.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This comment confuses me. Agreed, the IQ-gap data is shoddy and there's no substantial reason to think it's true. However, it's still possible better data will emerge. The question remains »unsettled«. By contrast, the historicity of the holocaust is absolutely settled.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.