Tweetovi
- Tweetovi, trenutna stranica.
- Tweetovi i odgovori
- Medijski sadržaj
Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @ent3c
Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @ent3c
-
Clinton after acquittal. What bothers me most about the Trumpian right-- a high bar-- is that they reject civility itself as somehow a characteristic of the elite, meant to mock them. Only thuggishness is genuine.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtwMG8JwvAI …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Eric Turkheimer proslijedio/la je Tweet
The 48 Senators who found Trump GUILTY represent 18 million MORE people than the 52 who voted not guilty.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
It's exactly like twin studies, where 25 years ago researchers discovered that rMZ is always > rDZ. A guaranteed result, even though it had essentially 0 substance. That is why I wrote the 3 laws paper. Meet the new genomic revolution, same as the old genomic revolution. /endpic.twitter.com/v6mr6ShVsc
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
If that is all that happens, the response should be, "Oh, well." All talk of "genomic discoveries" should be avoided. But instead researchers have learned that they have a route to a guaranteed result, so they do it over and over. /5
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
The first and fourth laws of BG, plus the phenotypic null hypothesis, combine to *guarantee* that there is some h2, some SNPs, some genetic correlations that look like the phenotypic correlations, for *everything*. This should be the null model. /4
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
It seems for most investigators, that would be h2=0, no significant SNPs, no genetic correlations with anything. The problem is, THAT RESULT WILL NEVER HAPPEN /3
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Usually when one conducts a study, there is a possible null result that will lead you to say, "Oh well, it didn't work." In a well-functioning scientific world that result is still publishable. What would such a result look like for GWAS? /2
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
In the course of my usual complaining about a GWAS-- never mind-- it occurred to me that the core of my problem is the lack of an appropriate null model. /1
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Agreed. R2 for PGS=.0025. There is no justification for reporting tiny uninterpretable genetic results for this kind of phenotype. Careerism only explanation. "Targeted treatment and prevention strategies," give me an effing break.https://twitter.com/cecilejanssens/status/1224746078962057218 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Smart reply to
@charlesmurray's op-ed in WSJ. My 2 cents: the "genetic revolution" Murray is waiting for is never going to get here. Inexorable progress of science is no help if the model is wrong.https://medium.com/@michellenmeyer/response-to-charles-murray-on-polygenic-scores-e768cf145cc …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Relevant to a department discussion. Given that they will both take up about the same amount of time (say an hour) which would you prefer as a way of reaching a decision on a matter of departmental policy?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
As usual,
@paulkrugman says what I think. I will happily support any Democrat who wins the nomination. All discussions among Democrats should start with that sentence.https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/31/opinion/does-it-matter-who-the-democrats-choose.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Could one of you having trouble connecting to http://geneticshumanagency.org try asking your IT office if they can explain what the problem is? Having trouble finding anything the matter on our end.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Another post on Human Diversity. What Is Genetic Determinism? http://www.geneticshumanagency.org/gha/more-on-murray-what-is-biological-determinism/ …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
My first comments on
@charlesmurray's Human Diversity, out today: http://www.geneticshumanagency.org/gha/charles-murrays-human-diversity/ …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Many uncertainties about Dem nomination. One thing is sure: when it is all over the
@nytimes op-ed page (except Krugman) won't support the nominee. If it is Biden instead of one of the scary radicals,#BretStephens will find another reason to oppose him.https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/24/opinion/sanders-warren-trump-2020.html …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Eric Turkheimer proslijedio/la je TweetHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Eric Turkheimer proslijedio/la je Tweet
Being all
#francophile with@BehaviorGenetic#legend@ent3c Eric Turkheimer.#paris@ENSAEparis@CrestSociologypic.twitter.com/PjZwaF13iV
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
The always eloquent Fardels Bear on the retrograde endorsement of race science by
@nathancofnas.https://altrightorigins.com/2020/01/21/race-and-iq-again/ …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Plus or minus some reliability, the twin genetics of intelligence looks pretty much like height. Now we can see why behavior is different: the gene-behavior pathways are more complex, more external, less "biological". IMHO the most important marginal contribution of GWAS.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.